BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND TWITTER BACKGROUNDS »

Monday, August 31, 2009

Naked Zazen

I know that Naked and Zazen are not generally things you'd be able to authentically link but I had to last night. It's FRACKING hot in my house these days. The weather in socal has been above 100 every day for several days and we don't user our AC. Normally I don't mind sweating a bit during zazen. It's just one more thing your body does that you're supposed to acknowledge but not foxus on. but buckets of sweat is way too much and the hotter it gets the harder it is to pay attention. Or to not pay attention to be more accurate.

So I ended up on my cushion with my bathrobe in my lap sweating slightly less than before and much more comfortable and thus easier to maintain my focus.

Not that I can focus for a whole two seconds at a time or anything but I'm getting there.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Emotions

I'm getting to a wierd point in my Buddhist life around emotions. Logically I know I don't need them but they are escapable.
Let me clarify.
It's not like the movies where the zen master is perfectly austere and completely lacking in emotions. In the same way that our body cannot be separated from our mind our mind cannot be separated from our emotions. They're there, they're real. Trying to not have any is just lying to yourself and just as harmful as having to much of them. The goal of Zen isn't to become a soulless, lifeless robot who is completely disconnected from the world. Quite the oposite in fact. The goal is to have more love, global love, love for all things and joy at their existence.

What I really mean is to do is not be so attached to my emotions. The goal of Zen is to no longer NEED them. The way a child REALLY NEEDS that new toy, or that candy, or whatever that shiny thing that is on the shelf when you pass it in the hallway in some store and then breaks down into tears when you pass it instead of picking it up and putting it in the cart. There's no reason not to enjoy it when you get it.

But I seem to _want_ to need them. If I was a monk I'd strive to be less controlled by them. I'd see the emotion come, acknowledge it and move on. What we do in real life is see the emotion, grab a hold of it with both hands and wave it around, hug it to us, shout at it or put it on like a cape and run around the room pretending to be superman.

If I wanted to lead a more 'Buddhist' or especially a more 'Zen' life I'd not be quite so ruled by said emotions. And honestly I'd probably be happier. I wouldn't be caught up by every little twitch my wife makes I wouldn't be driven insane and unable to sleep by work.

But I don't want to become that austere. I'm full of life and vitality. I know I can be full of life and vitality and be spiritual but it's different. My teacher Jane Schneiders in talking about this once said "It's not that you become completely detatched and no longer feel love. In a sense you become a tiny bit more detached but you still feel the love. In fact you feel more. You feel it more broadly and more deeply than ever, but you no longer need (crave) it."

Which sounds awesome. I could have wild blindly radient love for the whole universe and yet be comfortable enough with myself that I won't feel like blubbering if my wife forgets to kiss me in the morning or if my daughter says she wants her mom to pick her up instead of me (Sometimes It's me sometime's it's mom. we can't convince her that whenever she says that she hurts the feelings of the other parent.)

However for some reason I don't want this peace. I don't want to loose my craving for emotions. It's like the emotions define me. The emotions make me 'real.' In a sense they do. Not the Buddhist sense, but a sense. They make me 'real' because they define this idea of me. This false me that we all have, you have, I have, my dog has. This idea of a permanent singular self that we cling to. In the Buddhist sense that identity is crap. There is no 'me' there is no 'you.' We exist as separate entities because we are defined as separate entities. Being attached to these emotions just further solidifies that idea of segregation, which segregates me from you or from an alpaca in Mongolia. This segregation is the cornerstone of the ignorance (essentially a Buddhist sin but we don't have sins) that is the main source of suffering in this world.

In 'Zen Wrapped In Karma Dipped In Chocolate' Brad Warner describes it that we're affraid to trust ourselves. Affraid to believe that we are an original Buddha and that this is in us." Well damned straight I'm affraid. I don't know if I want to be a Buddha. I don't know if I want to trust myself.

But yet here I am writing a blog about becoming my Buddha self. About bringing the Buddha, and thus, you and the alpaca, into my heart and my life.

le sigh.

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Kamma

Kamma (pali) or Karma (sanskrit) is viewed in a lot of different ways. The most prevalent view being that it is some sort of cosmic currnecy. You earn good currency and you can spend it on bad things. You earn bad currency and you ahve to spend it on bad things. In the end if you have a shit ton of bad Kamma you become a dung beetle or get reborn in a hell inside of a mountain for 10,000 years or somesuch.

But like everything in Buddhism it's confusing when you delve into it in greater detail. On the outside Buddhism is pretty basic, pretty easy to understand.

Generally be groovy.

But that can be overly simplisitc.

I think it's important however to start with overly simplistic terms. I also think it's just as important to recognize that there are much much deeper meanings some of which can seem to contradict your overly simplistic idea (not in this case) but the overly simplistic term puts a qualification on the deeper idea.

The problem with overly simplistic terms is that people tend to just stop there and not recognize that the overly simplistic term is just setting the stage for a much deeper discussion. Let's take an example

Do no evil.

seems pretty straight forward. but then you dig deeper. Is unmarried sex evil if it's full of love and devotion? eternal love and devotion? Is marriage good when it's two people who hate one another who are 'staying togehter because of the kids' and all the while each one is telling the child aweful things about the other parent. Sewing seeds of hate and dispair in not only themselves but in each other and in their children?

There's nuances and in Buddhism the idea of nuances is more important than the 'rules' themselves. As long as you take the rules as a context.

So back to Kamma. Cosmic currency. In much thought Kamma is currency like money, you spend it. That means there has to be someone printing it, someone storing it in the back, metting it out when you deserve it taking it away and someone weighing it when you die.

In Buddhism Kamma isn't like this. It's like anything else in the world. You smoke, that contains carcinogens, carcinogens increase your risk of cancer. the more you smoke the more likely you are to get cancer. You eat vegetables, those are full of vitamins and minerals that your body needs to survive. Kamma is the same way. Nobody out there is going to decide that you effed up. Nobody is going to judge you against a yardstick. Kamma isn't something you're going to be able to hide or something you can weigh in at the end of your life. Many prison inmates 'find jesus' on death row. And I'm sure they really mean it. When they take jesus into their heards three days or six months before they die they really, really mean it. Because they're going to die.
Kamma doesn't work that way. Any more than you can be a drunkard eating big macs and smoking for 70 years and then eat 50 lbs of carrots a day when your doctor tells you you have 2 more months to live. It just won't work.
Kamma just catches up to you and you have to maintain it, always.
 Sure, you'll slip from time to time but heck some times those really healthy people have a donut. But usually we're in the middle somewhere. We try and eat healthy but it's a bit of a pain some times so we put it off until later.

The trick is this. First realize there's no later.

Second realize you're not perfect.

If you were going to drop all bad behavior, eating habits evil thoughts, etc. you'd go join a monestary and become a monk. But I'm guessing you haven't done that or you probably wouldn't be reading this. You have a job or school, you have a family, you have responsibilities, you have a cat.

You are who you are.* Just pay attention. Don't beat yourself up for making a mistake or lie to yourself and certainly don't tell yourself it'll happen later. Later is now, right now while you are screwing things up but you can improve, just a little and that's all it takes.

So just try.

just do a better job. Even if it's only a little bit better those little bits add up. Honestly if it was easy there wouldn't have been a Buddha. If it were even remotely close to easy we wouldn't have noticed the Buddha. In a gorgeous field of flowers how do you find the prettiest. We noticed the Buddha because he bloomed on a barren rock. Sure there were little flowers here and there poking out through crags but he bloomed bright and beautiful and stood out amoungst the rest.

Now here's something to bake your noodle. The Buddha clearly defined Kamma the above way. You have a lot of bad Kamma, you suffer. period, that's what happens, not because you're judged but because you just have bad shit that you've accepted. Now he also very clearly sayd 'I declare that cetana (there's a - over the last a,) which is translated as volition, as Khamma.

So is Khamma just thought? 'just' bad thought. if you kill people becuase you're crazy do you suffer Khamma? If you get cut off on the freeway and curse the guy do you get bad Khamma?

No

and yes.

One of the things that pushed me away from Christianity was a similar idea. The idea that if I thought bad thoughts I would be damned to hell. Mearly thinking 'FUCK' if I missed the nail and hammered my finger with a big fricking hammer Jesus would put a big check in the 'going to hell' column on my holy roster. This sounded dumb frankly. So here I am now becoming more and more deeply involved in a relegion that says "Mind is the forruner of all states" that is the very first line of a text called the Dhammapada. The Dhammapada is really like those little cardboard jesus for kids books. It's the shortest and simplest of all the traditionalal Theravada canon (think of it as 'old Buddhism.') It is the text that was designed to be able to be read by the largest group of people. If you wanted to you could read it in like 20 minutes or less.
which of course means I have a 10 lb version that is VERY thorughoughly annotated and each 8-16 word verse has an acompanying page to page and a half of story from the Buddha's life illustrating it and a ton of comments.

Now both of the first two verses start with the same 2 lines.
Manopubbagamā dhammā manoseṭṭhā manomayā
Manasā ce pasannena bhāsati vā karoti vā

Which are pretty much "All that we are is the result of what we have thought: it is founded on our thoughts, it is made up of our thoughts." They are freqently translated more roughtly into something like "Mind is the forruner of all states"
each one is followed up by a slightly fancy way of saying if one's thoughts are bad bad shit happens (or follows like the wheel of a cart follows an ox.) and if they're good good shit happens.
But in the shorter translations each verse is actually translated as "Mind is the forruner of all evil states" and "Mind is the forruner of all good states" to simplify it a bit.

So here I am now following a religion that very clearly states that bad thoughts are bad.
The difference is context. In Buddhism we very clearly recognize that thoughts happen. They're supposed to happen. In fact one of the whole purposes of Zen Buddhism and Zazen is to _let_ them happen, rather than try and deny them. Having a bad thought isn't wrong. Clinging to that bad thought is wrong. When someone cuts us off on the freeway we're likely to have some defensive adversarial thought pop into our head.

That is normal and healthy.
let me repeat it.
when someone does something that risks your life and this adversarial angry thought pops into your head it is normal and healthy.

What is nor healthy but is unfortunately normal is for you to fume about it for the next 20 minutes. "That bastard" or even screaming out the window at the "Dubmassed jerk who just cut you off" Now you're generating a tremendous amount of energy, a tremendous amount of evil bad thought (and thus Khamma.) That is not only you but that is being sent into the world and will help destroy it.

So get the fuck over it. Shut up, stop talking about it, calm down, grow up, whatever it takes. Let the bad thought happen but then let it go.

*And so am I. ^_^

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Right Effort Right Concentration

Right now I am practicing neither. I've been at work for about an hour now and probably put in 15 minutes of work. The rest has been Buddhist stuff and an email conversation with my wife.

Now I'm writing a blog entry about spirituality.

But I feel like I need the way. I've often in my life felt the desire to do something like become a priest. To teach people the joy and love that can be attained through spirituality but to teach them something that didn't suck. Most of what I've viewed as Christianity didn't qualify. I never considered the idea of becoming a Buddhist monk because like most of you I have this idea that they're all head shaved ascetics who live in a monastery and don't have any fun.

let alone sex.

But recently I've learned that isn't true anymore. Sure there still are tons that do but there's also tons of well respected monks like Nishijima Roshi that worked for a cosmetics company for years. And some less respected but no less well versed in the Dharma like Brad Warner who worked for a company that made Godzilla movies till he got to the point where he could make money on his books and on speaking engagements.

Does this mean I want to be a monk?

I don't know really. That's sort of a big commitment and I don't know if I'm up to it.

I'm not even certain why am I considering it. Is it because I think I'll achieve some magical sense of peace and no longer be concerned with these worldly toils? Probably, but then logically I know this isn't true. On the other hand there will be some sort of calm that comes from the true realization that we are all one, connected, interconnected, the same. That all this suffering in the world is transitory and not real. Things that I know with my head but still don't quite stick in my daily life.

If I did then how would I support my family?

I don't know. I think I do want to take the precepts, a zen ceremony. Hopefully I can make it tonight but I think I need to restart a server for someone. Maybe I can get a coworker to do that and I can go discuss it with my teachers. I'll shoot for that.

Monk hood. Am I being selfish instead of wanting to do it to help people?

maybe

Is my sudden re-conversion to Buddhism stemming from some stupid new-agey kinda hippy bullshit.
probably

Is there a larger part of me that has always felt that God has been talking to him?

Yes.

Am I getting back to work now and planning on accomplishing something?

Definitely

Friday, August 14, 2009

Some Progress 1

This is actually a bit late. I've pretty much made about six steps on my goal towards not hating everything about wife's choice of religeon but I had to get through those steps before I could be comfortable enough writing about them. Truth is I'm making a much bigger deal of it than she is. But I knew that would be the case. I'm the one with the problem not her.

Well I've been doing a bunch of reading. Read 'Living Buddha, Living Christ." by Thich Nhat Hanh. I'll be seeing him sept 19th. He's doing some speaking. Funny part is while my wife was searching for God she brought home "Jesus and Buddha as brothers" by him. I read about three paragraphs and said "Looks like it's just some attempt to make Christianity palatable for Buddhists. I have no interest in understanding and accepting them." Man, what a dick.

I knew subconciously it was her attempt to help me be comfortable with it but it didn't sink in that she'd already made her choice to be Christian. The ironic part is that she doesn't remember that book, apparently she didn't read it and now I'm the one getting the books and giving them to her. I'm not pushing the Buddhism on her but she's trying to understand it as much as I'm trying to understand hers. There's a bunch of concepts in Buddhism that are, to be honest, kind of odd and very difficult for most western minds to wrap around. I'm not really sure why I don't have a problem with it. I'm exploring that, more on that in a later post.

I'm a lot more comfortable than I used to be with the wife's choice. It helps that she's Catholic. Much to my surprise Catholosism is one of the most flexible. Supporting science and such things. hell the vatican is becoming solar powered. The most important part is the importance they place on helping people. The teachings of Catholosism and buddhism are actually very close. Jesus said go help people. My wife made a comment once. "There are two ways to view what Jesus said. You can focus on helping people here on this earth and pray as well. Or you can Pray constantly and focus on helping them in the after life. You can guess from the number of Hospitals with names that start with 'St. ...' which one the catholic church focuses on.' it really helps.

Monday, August 10, 2009

Tao (the way)

So I've started a spiritual journey. It's been tough. I am a little surprised that I'm doing it and it's not really the sort of thing I would normally have sought out.

The truth is I was forced into it. You see my wife found God. She's not being preachy or trying to steal the kids from me or anything horrible. She's been great about it. The problem is me. You see I have a problem with Christianity. I hate it, I loathe it, I feel that most of the terrible things that have happened in this world have been a result of it. It's a feeling that has grown in me gradually over the past 15-20 years. Or at least I did for about the last ten years until about six months or a year ago when I started to calm down.

So when I finally found out about the wife I had a crisis. I couldn't believe she had brought this evil into my house. I actually said that out loud in front of her can you believe it? After a while of reflecting on this. A while being months and months. Plus being torn by the fact that I love her dearly and that I respect her greatly I started to realize something very important. In my hatred of what Christians had done in the name of God I had learn to hate Christians. I had become the very thing I hated them for. A vessel of ignorance, hatred and intolerance. This had to change. A little history Some 20 years or so ago I was an avid church goer. During that period I learned of this ignorance and hatred and I knew that God could not be like this. So I found my own path. Over the next 5 years or so I explored myself and the universe deeply through contemplative meditation and developed some very strong feelings about how the world worked. They included ideas like reincarnation and the love and interconectedness of all things.

about 15+ years ago I discovered Buddhism. I was and still am constantly amazed at how much it matched my own explorations and theories and so I began following it. I'd already started down the path and here was a guide from those who had gone down the same path before me.

Unfortunately I didn't stick with it. The Buddha sort of moved from my heart to my back pocket. Buddhism was always something I would get back to. I've got completely unread Buddhist texts that I've had for 5 years now. Some day. I would get back into Buddhism, learn a bit more and start meditating again.

Well this was the day. See Buddhism speaks to me very closely. And one of the neat things about it specific to this situation is that Acceptance of other peoples religion is a requirement. No Buddhist who truly understands the Darhma will ever tell you that your religion is wrong, less accurate. So I'm diving in full bore. Grabbed a bunch more texts and I'm reading them. Some from the buddhist restaurant we go to for the vegitarian chinese food. Some online, some I've just had for a long time and don't know why. Some that folks have brought to me from taiwan or something. Others that I've picked up as giveaways and a chinese Buddhist restaurant.

Tao in Chinese means way or path. Both of these words are used to describe the Buddha's teachings. Both by him and by others. My initial exposure to Buddhism was essentially zen. But in the kung fu theathre sort of way. I got it from a martial arts instructor and a very good frient. I learned a lot spiritually from the man. I'm sure there will be more on him later.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Bare Naked?

This blog was originally titled Dhammaboy. The below is why I chose it.
The new name reflects a couple of things. First off my approach to Zen is naked.. Or at least I'm trying to. I'm really focusing on emptying my cup as it were. Starting over 'beginners mind.'

Second because naked is cool. And some times it's needed in the middle of summer. ^_^

For the old name
Because the name was cool.

That's why I picked it. My other blog (the hole in my head, which I'm not really using) still has a good name for the topic at hand. The topic of my progression in Buddhism. Who knows, I may keep that one and move everything over but this sounded cool.

I'm such a dork.

*Note, Most people are familiar with Karma, the 'cosmic currency of Buddhism, Hindu and others. Some people are familiar with Dharma, the budhist teachings. Well I've been reading Pali stuff (the original original language of Bhuddism. and Karma and Dharma are both sanscrit words. Translations but early ones. Pali ones tend to be a couple years later and there are still a few texts that haven't even been translate yet. So I will often use pali here. So Karma is Khamma and Dharma is Dhamma